0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

Is DAC dead? Will other CDR pathways get a second look? And will watercress save the world?

Carbon Technology Research Foundation (CTRF) funds research areas that look to piggyback on nature to drawdown greenhouse gases. We spoke with Philippa Mina and Luke Williams.

Outro of the Day

Why the intro theme from 2001: A Space Odyssey - a meditation on how the fate of humanity is bound up with making good decisions about technology?

Is that really a question?

Share

We’re on a bit of a carbon dioxide removals kick this week. The Climeworks ‘headwinds’ we spoke about with

in our previous episode continue to blow.

Wicked Problems is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The question is whether they achieve such force that they affect not just one firm but direct air capture (DAC) and the broader effort around using tech to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.

While DAC commands a lot of attention - for reasons we get into in today’s episode - it isn’t the only pathway. Carbon Technology Research Foundation (CTRF) has been funding research that looks at a very different set of pathways - using biotech to boost the ability of plants and micro-organisms to eat more of the gases that are heating up the planet.

In this conversation we spoke to two of CTRF’s top brass: Philippa Mina from her office in a satellite campus in Cornwall that is actually part of the University of Exeter, which must make for confusing scone/jam/cream problems at tea time; and Luke Williams, head of research, from what looked very much like a hotel room out of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

We talk through some of CTRF’s approach, and also what this moment might mean for the broader sector including things outside of DAC - and whether those other research areas might now get more attention. Such as the biotech projects they support.

Leave a comment

We get into why it may still be early to take anything other than a portfolio approach to a set of approaches we will absolutely need to work at scale before this century is out, including engineered versions of plants, marine carbon sequestration, the importance of transparency and trust, and the funding conundrum in current climate research.

00:00 Introduction and Welcome

00:46 Guest Introductions and Background

02:21 Discussion on Carbon Removals

03:58 Challenges and Perspectives in Carbon Removal

07:37 CTRF's Approach and Projects

16:13 Funding and Future of Carbon Removal Research

Further Reading/Listening

CTRF project overview:

New Scientist article on Mary Lidstrom’s work

Podcast with CTRF founder Stig Arff

State of CDR report - https://www.stateofcdr.org/

One Last Thing

Akshat Rathi interviewed Climeworks’ CEO about those headwinds - including the collapse in US supports for DAC hubs and its decision to lay off 20% of staff. Worth a listen:

All the Outros

Have a good weekend. Bit eclectic but we think our collection of outros is totally worth it:

Update

has his own update out at ! Read it:

Marginal Carbon
CDR has three jobs, only one needs permanence
There is currently much discussion about when permanent carbon removal should be required and when removals with a higher risk of reversal may be accepted. I believe people are talking past one another, conflating the three use cases of carbon removal…
Read more